I think FindrCat and Spotlight indexing are all clip-based. Using this method you'd curate, rate and keyword imported media within a given FCPX library, then export using FindrCat which preserves those as Finder tags on the media files, making them searchable using the MacOS Spotlight indexing system.ĭata organization using the FCPX rating and keywording system is heavily range-based, not just clip-based.
Findrcat pro pro#
I think Frame.io or KeyFlow Pro give that, but you can do it yourself manually with the inexpensive tool FindrCat. What you'd ideally like is cross-library searching.
KeyFlow Pro 2: See also PostLab: /postlab/conceptsįCPX by itself is really good at data organization but scope is limited to a single library. However you don't necessarily need these and can "roll your own" collaborative system, but at a possibly significant cost in investigative and testing time. There are now FCPX workflow extensions that integrate and provide MAM capabilities. Wondering what others are using that you feel is a good marriage between FCPX and the MAM? Would like a system that doesn't nickel and dime you to death.
We want to work off our internal Windows server currently (a MacMini server in-between is fine), then eventually migrate to the cloud, once pricing has dropped to fit our budget. Our setup is currently one editor with a second one in place in the next year or two. As I look more at the rich metadata within Final Cut, I don't see much out there so far that has a really good ability to read/write FCPX metadata. budget non-profit, for a media asset management system.
0 kommentar(er)
